Name as much prep stores as you can?

tonynguyen

Name as much prep brands as you can
winner gets 10 points =)

Answer
abercrombie kids
abercrombie and fitch
hollister
banana republic
delias
alloy
roxy
juicy cuitore
wet seal
forever 21
american eagle
lacoste
burberry
coach
gap
club libby lu
limited too
niemans
some of nordstoms
ugg australia
sugar (shoes)
aeropostale
victoria secret (kinda)
ralph lauren/polo
bebe
guess (kinda)
betsy johnson
armani
charlotte ruse
tiffanys
chanel
kate spade
the co op
calvin klein
dolche and gabana
gadzooks
sanrio
BP
paul frank
frenchi
ruby rox
puma (sometimes)
tommy hilfigure
express
buckle
bui ya kah
vera bradly
Lilly Pulitzer
L.L. Bean
gucci
birkenstock
old navy
marc jacobs
dooney&bourke
louis vuitton
ann taylor
liz clayborne
lucky
prada
talbots
talbots kids
macys
saks
chloe
american sherif
xhileration
lower east side (shoes)
dilliards
claires
pacsun (kinda)
luca luca
jansport (backpacks)
rue 21
kohls
bloomingdales
DDE
crafy couture
disney couture
gap kids
icing
journeys
north face
klub nico
heather hyde
dkny
moon
jc penny
silhouettes
keds
sara jayne
nine west
H&M
levi
converse
rainbow
bongo
so low
akademiks
svoboda
vanity
fred flare
BCBGirls
urban outfitters
BB dakota
club monaco
echo
skechers
gwen stafani line
hilary duff line
jaime mascaro
charles david
anthropologie
tilt
aldo
hurley
baby phat
phat farm
doll house
givenchy
the limited
Eddie Bauer
Brooks Brothers
Patagonia
vineyard vines
fossil
ruehl no. 925
nautica
dots
platos closet
justice
lands end
bealls
ross
tjmaxx
marshalls
loyal army
a fine mess
johny m
palais royal
mudd

ps. a lot of these brands may seem fake..but theyre not they are just brands youd find at stores if u look hard enough

Helpppp! if anyone knows alot about school law, we need your opinion on this school law case!?

KaylaBear2

my group and I are doing a project where were defending a school district in the following scenario. its a hard case and we need others opinions pleaseeeee. :)

okay so the school is very highly ethnically diverse and it has a reputation of being free from disciplinary problems such as fighting and racism.
lately students have been getting into tiffs over some racial issues and admin. was hearing about possible fights and everyone was told to be alert about weapons and other actions that could lead to fights.

one day at lunch, Teacher 1 had her wallet stolen from her bag in the classroom and a 20 dollar bill was in it.

after school, a student went to the student store to buy some supplies. he put his sweatshirt and backpack on a desk and went to the counter to buy his stuff. he paid with a 20$ bill.

Teacher 2 who was running the store noticed the billl an was suspicious. she went to the desk where the students stuff was and since the front pocket of the backpack was open, she peered inside but didnt touch anything. she thought Teacher 1 wallet would be in there. instead she found a pocket knife.

Teacher 2 went to the VP to let him know about the weapon.

The VP knows that the student is in Teacher 1 class and that the student has defacing school property on his record from freshman year but he was an excellent student. The VP told the student to empty his pockets. the student did so and nothing was in his pockets. The VP then looked through the students backpack and sweatshirt and he found the knife. student said he forgot to take it out because he went on a camping trip the weekend before. the VP suspended him and told the principal. Teacher 2 told the principal that she went through the students belongings becasue she was suspicious about the wallet theft and looked for nothing else.

the principal recommended to the district that the student be expelled for violating the zero tolerance policy on weapons. the students parents are sueing the school.

How is the school right in this decision? how can the school defend themselves? any additional advice would be appreciated

Answer
The problem with asking this question such a broad forum as Y!A is that there are so many school districts with so many different policies. Districts and individual schools themselves each have their own policies, so long as those policies don't run contrary to established laws of the county, state or federal government (for example you can't have a school policy that vandals will have their hands cut off.)
However, the specific issues in this case fall into a problematic area. While if there were adults we were talking about in a public place, there would be several violations of due process, most school districts are more or less allowed to violate student's rights to privacy, freedom of speech and right to trial and due process with utter impunity. The broad legal concept is called "in loco parentis" and basically means the students can be treated as thought the teachers were their parents. Parents don't need probably cause, search warrants or a trial to ground their children. Schools can basically due whatever they want to students so long as it doesn't break laws on abuse or harassment.
In court, this could get highly contentious because expulsion technically denies a child the right to education they are entitled to under law. In this case, the reason for expulsion could be ruled as "capricious" or "excessive" (that is, the kid didn't hurt anyone, rather the possession of a knife was a technicality). The reasoning is that the student did not show intent to harm anyone and he may very well be telling the truth that he brought it by accident. A "zero tolerance" policy does not allow for accidents or mistakes and thus punishes people who had no criminal intent. This is not "justice" because it is unfair, and illustrates how the law and justice can easily diverge.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Title Post: Name as much prep stores as you can?
Rating: 95% based on 981 ratings. 4,6 user reviews.
Author: Unknown

Thanks For Coming To My Blog